The case involves a contractual dispute between Al Jazira FC Sports Company and Hugo Garcia Martorell, a licensed football players' agent, over unpaid commissions related to the transfer of a player from Al Jazira to Gremio FC. The agreement, signed on July 10, 2014, stipulated that Al Jazira would pay Martorell €300,000 in installments for his services in facilitating the transfer, which involved a €1.9 million fee from Gremio to Al Jazira. Martorell claimed that Al Jazira failed to pay the first installment of €50,000, which was due upon receipt of the first payment from Gremio. He filed a claim with FIFA's Players’ Status Committee (PSC) on March 27, 2015, seeking payment of the owed amount and future installments. Al Jazira contested FIFA's jurisdiction, arguing Martorell lacked standing under FIFA rules and that payment was contingent on receiving funds from Gremio. Martorell later amended his claim to seek the full €200,000, plus interest, after providing evidence that Gremio had paid the full transfer fee. The PSC ruled in Martorell's favor, ordering Al Jazira to pay €200,000 plus interest. Al Jazira appealed to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), arguing the agreement was invalid due to non-compliance with FIFA's Players’ Agent Regulations, specifically the lack of a prior representation contract. The CAS panel upheld the PSC's decision, finding that Al Jazira had ratified Martorell's actions and acknowledged the debt, making the agreement valid despite procedural irregularities. The panel concluded Martorell was entitled to his commissions for services rendered on behalf of the club. The case underscores the enforceability of agreements even when formal regulatory requirements are not strictly met, provided there is clear ratification and acknowledgment by the parties involved. The CAS rejected Al Jazira's appeal, affirming the FIFA Dispute Resolution Chamber's decision and ruling in favor of Martorell, including the payment of €200,000 and interest. The outcome highlights the importance of contractual obligations and the legal recognition of services rendered, even in the absence of strict procedural compliance.