The case involves a dispute between Saudi FC Al-Ittihad Jeddah Club and FIFA-licensed agent Eduardo Uram over unpaid agency fees related to the transfer of a Brazilian player in 2012. The club had signed an employment contract with the player and concurrently entered into an agency agreement with Uram, stipulating a fee of USD 400,000 payable in two installments, with penalties for late payment. When the club failed to pay, Uram initiated proceedings before FIFA's Players' Status Committee, seeking USD 420,000 (including a penalty fee) plus interest. The club argued that Uram had induced the player to breach his contract and that the fee was excessive, but the FIFA Single Judge ruled in favor of Uram, emphasizing that clubs cannot withhold payment based on alleged misconduct by the agent and that the agreed fee was binding under the principle of pacta sunt servanda. The club appealed to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), which upheld the FIFA decision. The CAS panel found no evidence that Uram had accepted a termination agreement or acted in bad faith, nor did it find the fee excessive under Swiss law or FIFA regulations. The club's claims were dismissed, and it was ordered to pay the full fee plus interest. The case highlights the enforceability of contractual obligations in football transactions and the limited grounds for challenging agreed remuneration, reinforcing that clubs cannot unilaterally withhold payments based on unproven allegations. The decision underscores the importance of contractual freedom and the burden of proof in disputes involving agent fees.