The case involves a legal dispute between FC Dacia SRL, a Moldovan football club, and Rohan Ricketts, a British professional football player, concerning the validity of two employment contracts and the termination of their professional relationship. The core issues revolved around the authenticity of a second contract, the justification for termination, and the financial consequences of the dispute. Ricketts claimed two contracts were signed: the first, valid from July 23, 2010, to June 20, 2013, with a monthly salary of 2,500 Moldovan Leu (MDL), and a second, allegedly signed the same day, which included a higher salary of 6,545 USD per month and a 5,000 USD bonus. FC Dacia disputed the validity of the second contract, alleging the signature of their representative was forged. A forensic expert report concluded the second contract’s signature was likely simulated, leading the tribunal to rule it unenforceable.
Ricketts argued he had just cause to terminate the contract due to the club’s failure to pay salaries and his exclusion from the team. The tribunal upheld his claim, stating severe breaches like non-payment or exclusion justify immediate termination without prior warning. The financial consequences were assessed under Article 17(1) of FIFA’s Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players, which considers factors such as contract terms, remuneration, and the specificity of sport. The tribunal emphasized fair compensation, accounting for the player’s subsequent earnings and the club’s saved salary costs. Ultimately, the tribunal ruled Ricketts could retain the 5,000 USD advance as fair compensation, dismissing other claims.
The case highlights the complexities of contractual disputes in football, including the burden of proof in authenticity challenges and the principles governing termination with just cause. It underscores the importance of clear contractual agreements and the need for fair resolution mechanisms in sports employment disputes. The tribunal’s decision balanced contractual stability with the unique dynamics of player-club relationships, ensuring a fair outcome based on the specific circumstances of the case.